[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440804291457k79099d84w53110fabf59e9e37@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:57:48 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mika Fischer" <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mtrr cleanup for converting continuous to discrete layout v5
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 1:29 PM, Eric W. Biederman
<ebiederm@...ssion.com> wrote:
> "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com> writes:
>
> > (less memory + fast X) or (more 8M RAM + slow...)
>
> Yes. That is the basic question. Not all X drivers need it and
> potentially the current kernel drm modules can use the
> PAT infrastructure that has been merged.
>
> Further a SMM monitor running 100 times or more slower may cause
> problems if SMM mode is entered frequently, slowing down the entire
> system not just X.
>
> So if you don't have X or you have a crazy SMM monitor this can
> be an issue.
agreed. so that feature is compiled in but disable by default.
BTW: is any chance for OS to disable SMI etc? to verify is the
unstatbility is caused by SMI?
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists