linux-kernel - Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.25-git] gpio: sysfs interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200804291455.39674.david-b@pacbell.net>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 14:55:39 -0700
From:	David Brownell <david-b@...bell.net>
To:	Ben Nizette <bn@...sdigital.com>
Cc:	Trent Piepho <tpiepho@...escale.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	hartleys <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier.adi@...il.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch/rfc 2.6.25-git] gpio: sysfs interface

On Tuesday 29 April 2008, Ben Nizette wrote:
> 4) Status quo.  Easy, efficient, potentially hard to discover which gpio
> you actually want.
> 
> My vote's for 1 or 4.  The first one is heavier but easier.  The last
> one will need something like the discussed file mapping ranges to gpios.

My vote is for #4 with a chip listing file.

I don't like the hacked names ... none of the other /sys/class/*/name
files on any of my systems use hacked names.  The entire motivation for
name hacking seems wrong to me, and by observation it's been rejected
for all other class names.

- Dave

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/