linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] bitops: remove "optimizations"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20080429.153125.249690136.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	mingo@...e.hu
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	harvey.harrison@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: remove "optimizations"

From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:20:39 +0200

> 
> * David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> 
> > Ironically, I just bisected sparc64 bootup failures to the following 
> > changeset.  It's very late here, and I haven't looked into the 
> > details, but it seems to wedge in free_area_init_nodes() on a non-NUMA 
> > system with CONFIG_NUMA disabled.
> 
> hm. I guess the next thing you plan to check is whether Thomas's patch 
> fixes it?

Yes, I just needed some sleep first, which I just obtained :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/