lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4817A3C1.1020908@freescale.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:40:01 -0500
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
	Mark Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Roland Kuhn <rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why use /bin/sh in kernel build system?

Willy Tarreau wrote:

> Hint: not every joe user may install bash into /bin... That's why we
> see some scripts begin with "/usr/bin/env bash" as there are less
> systems without env in /usr/bin than systems without bash in /bin (or
> at all).

I agree that #!/bin/bash is a bad idea.  I think the easiest, and maybe the
best, approach is to fix shell issue one-by-one.  The one I found was easily
fixed by Al Viro's here-document change.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ