[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4817A3C1.1020908@freescale.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:40:01 -0500
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Mark Rustad <mrustad@...il.com>,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Roland Kuhn <rkuhn@....physik.tu-muenchen.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...IV.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: Why use /bin/sh in kernel build system?
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hint: not every joe user may install bash into /bin... That's why we
> see some scripts begin with "/usr/bin/env bash" as there are less
> systems without env in /usr/bin than systems without bash in /bin (or
> at all).
I agree that #!/bin/bash is a bad idea. I think the easiest, and maybe the
best, approach is to fix shell issue one-by-one. The one I found was easily
fixed by Al Viro's here-document change.
--
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists