[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080428205522.28dce527.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2008 20:55:22 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bernd Schubert <bernd-schubert@....de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 008 of 9] md: md: raid5 rate limit error printk
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:35:34 +1000 NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de> wrote:
> + printk_rl(KERN_WARNING "raid5:%s: read error NOT corrected!! "
> + "(sector %llu on %s).\n",
> + mdname(conf->mddev),
> + (unsigned long long)(sh->sector + rdev->data_offset),
> + bdn);
> else if (atomic_read(&rdev->read_errors)
> > conf->max_nr_stripes)
> printk(KERN_WARNING
>
> diff .prev/include/linux/raid/md_k.h ./include/linux/raid/md_k.h
> --- .prev/include/linux/raid/md_k.h 2008-04-29 12:25:24.000000000 +1000
> +++ ./include/linux/raid/md_k.h 2008-04-29 12:27:58.000000000 +1000
> @@ -368,6 +368,9 @@ static inline void safe_put_page(struct
> if (p) put_page(p);
> }
>
> +#define printk_rl printk_ratelimit() ?: printk
(boggle)
Isn't this backwards? Should be !printk_ratelimit()?
open-coding the printk_ratelimit() at each callsite would be more
conventional.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists