[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080430163355.4b4f23ec.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:33:55 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
y-goto@...fujitsu.com
Subject: Re: sparc64 bootup regression...
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:25:30 -0700 (PDT)
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:15:40 +0900
>
> > How about this ? If this is messy (or doesn't work), Goto-san will rework
> > his own patch by himself. (this patch is against -mm but I think no HUNK to
> > git tree)
>
> This makes the original change pointless.
>
It seems the orignal change expects NODE_DATA() is allocated at boottime.
not in .bss section.
> If the goal is to put the usemap in the same section as the memory
> itself, in order to allow for it to be freed during memory hotplug,
> this new change just makes the facility not work some of the time.
>
yes, at least, WARNING is necessary.
> Now maybe sometimes it will work, maybe sometimes it will not.
>
> It's not the end of the world if this change is reverted for a few
> days while we work out what to do about this.
>
yes ;)
> Really, it does not reflect badly upon you or Goto-san, if the change
> is reverted temporarily.
>
Okay, I agree to revert it.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists