linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209581119.2946.104.camel@vader.jdub.homelinux.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 13:45:19 -0500
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 19:43 +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 13:26 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > Do you see this list as a general embedded patch/issues discussion list,
> > a help list, a list for vendors to interact with the community, or all
> > of the above?
> 
> All of the above -- although I dislike the phrase 'interact with the
> community'. I want vendors to be _part_ of the community, not outsiders
> who merely interact with it.

Sure, agreed.  Have to start somewhere though.

josh

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/