linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804301153100.2980@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:55:57 -0700 (PDT)
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc0

On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> 
> please pull from: 
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release

Ok, this clashed in some nasty ways in drivers/acpi/video.c due to the 
non-racy /proc file creation changes that came through Andrew. I fixed up 
the result, and it *looks* sane (and compiles), but I didn't actually test 
it, and I don't know the code well. Can you double-check.

There were some (smaller) rejects in drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c due to 
two different versions of the same patch from Julia Lawall (again, the 
other came through Andrew), and I picked the one from Andrew because it 
had the later date. But again, you should double-check.

		Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/