[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080430165214.10b793b4@gaivota>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 16:52:14 -0300
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To: mkrufky@...uxtv.org
Cc: bunk@...nel.org, mingo@...e.hu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] dvb: build failure fix
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:31:42 -0400
mkrufky@...uxtv.org wrote:
> > Are there actually reports from users running into this problem?
No.
Yet, the configuration may be valid. If you have a board with tda8290, it
_will_ need another chip, like tda827x.
In the past, both tda8290 and tda827x were handled by the same driver, and
worked for analog only.
So, IMO, this is a regression.
> >> Maybe, we
> >> may just do:
> >> obj-y += /dvb
> >> ...
> >>
> >
> > Do DVB_TDA827X/DVB_TDA18271 need anything from DVB_CORE?
> >
> > If yes you'd only transform one build error into another.
>
> DVB_TDA827X and DVB_TDA18271 do not need anything from DVB_CORE -- their
> only dependency is I2C_CORE.
>
> I think Mauro renamed those Kconfig symbols to MEDIA_TUNER_TDAfoo now, btw.
I can't foresee any issues with those drivers. The risk I can see is to compile
some dvb core things that aren't needed, or whose Kconfig dependencies may be
incomplete.
I didn't make yet a deeper analysis to be sure that this won't cause any issues,
but I suspect that this would be safe.
I agree that we need to check the resulting dependencies.
Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists