[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080430205615.GA23694@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 22:56:15 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: [patch] acpi: acpi_numa_init() build fix
* Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org> wrote:
> This batch is a proper super-set of the pull request I made a week
> ago. It will update the files shown below.
something in this batch broke the build on x86 on current -git. Somewhat
band-aid-ish fix below.
Ingo
------------->
Subject: acpi: acpi_numa_init() build fix
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Tue Apr 29 00:40:16 CEST 2008
x86.git testing found the following build error on latest -git:
drivers/acpi/numa.c: In function 'acpi_numa_init':
drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: 'NR_NODE_MEMBLKS' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
drivers/acpi/numa.c:226: error: for each function it appears in.)
with this config:
http://redhat.com/~mingo/misc/config-Wed_Apr_30_22_42_42_CEST_2008.bad
i suspect we dont want SRAT parsing when CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
is unset - but the fix looks a bit ugly. Perhaps we should define
NR_NODE_MEMBLKS even in this case and just let the code fall back
to some sane behavior?
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
drivers/acpi/numa.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
Index: linux/drivers/acpi/numa.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/drivers/acpi/numa.c
+++ linux/drivers/acpi/numa.c
@@ -176,6 +176,7 @@ acpi_parse_processor_affinity(struct acp
return 0;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
static int __init
acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_subtable_header * header,
const unsigned long end)
@@ -193,6 +194,7 @@ acpi_parse_memory_affinity(struct acpi_s
return 0;
}
+#endif
static int __init acpi_parse_srat(struct acpi_table_header *table)
{
@@ -221,9 +223,11 @@ int __init acpi_numa_init(void)
if (!acpi_table_parse(ACPI_SIG_SRAT, acpi_parse_srat)) {
acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_CPU_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_processor_affinity, NR_CPUS);
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PARSE_SRAT
acpi_table_parse_srat(ACPI_SRAT_TYPE_MEMORY_AFFINITY,
acpi_parse_memory_affinity,
NR_NODE_MEMBLKS);
+#endif
}
/* SLIT: System Locality Information Table */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists