[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4818F093.3070105@hartkopp.net>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 00:20:03 +0200
From: Oliver Hartkopp <oliver@...tkopp.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC] Kernel naming convention in the merge phase
Hi all,
i wonder about the Kernel naming convention in the merge phase before
the -rc1 is officially tagged by Linus.
Won't it be more precisely to name the current snapshot
2.6.26-merge-git16 instead of 2.6.25-git16?
It is not that i would suggest to have a new git tag in this merge phase
but only the Makefile should be changed at the beginning of this phase
to identify the ongoing work for the 2.6.26:
------
diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
index d3634cd..b8c85a4 100644
--- a/Makefile
+++ b/Makefile
@@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
VERSION = 2
PATCHLEVEL = 6
-SUBLEVEL = 25
-EXTRAVERSION =
-NAME = Funky Weasel is Jiggy wit it
+SUBLEVEL = 26
+EXTRAVERSION = -merge
+NAME = unnamed
# *DOCUMENTATION*
# To see a list of typical targets execute "make help"
------
Introducing the new '-merge' version _that_ early helps to avoid the
version confusion in /lib/modules and also allows people to work with
kernel version depended stuff in a very early phase.
Regards,
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists