[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080430141738.e6b80d4b.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 14:17:38 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi>
Cc: Tony Battersby <tonyb@...ernetics.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] more ZERO_PAGE handling ( was 2.6.24 regression:
deadlock on coredump of big process)
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008 08:03:33 +0300
Mika Penttilä <mika.penttila@...umbus.fi> wrote:
> > ==
> > @@ -2252,39 +2158,24 @@ static int do_anonymous_page(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > spinlock_t *ptl;
> > {
> > <snip>
> > - page_add_new_anon_rmap(page, vma, address);
> > - } else {
> > - /* Map the ZERO_PAGE - vm_page_prot is readonly */
> > - page = ZERO_PAGE(address);
> > - page_cache_get(page);
> > - entry = mk_pte(page, vma->vm_page_prot);
> > + if (unlikely(anon_vma_prepare(vma)))
> > + goto oom;
> > + page = alloc_zeroed_user_highpage_movable(vma, address);
> > ==
> >
> > above change is for avoiding to use ZERO_PAGE at read-page-fault to anonymous
> > vma. This is reasonable I think. But at coredump, tons of read-but-never-written
> > pages can be allocated.
> > ==
> > coredump
> > -> get_user_pages()
> > -> follow_page() returns NULL
> > -> handle mm fault
> > -> do_anonymous page.
> > ==
> > follow_page() returns ZERO_PAGE only when page table is not avaiable.
> >
> > So, making follow_page() return ZERO_PAGE can be a fix of extra memory
> > consumpstion at core dump. (Maybe someone can think of other fix.)
> >
> > how about this patch ? Could you try ?
> >
> > (I'm sorry but I'll not be active for a week because my servers are powered off.)
> >
> > -Kame
> >
> >
>
>
> But sure we still have to handle the fault for instance swapped pages,
> for other uses of get_user_pages();
>
Ah, my bad.....how about this ? I changed !pte_present() to pte_none().
-Kame
==
follow_page() returns ZERO_PAGE if a page table is not available.
but returns NULL if a page table exists. If NULL, handle_mm_fault()
allocates a new page.
This behavior increases page consumption at coredump, which tend
to do read-once-but-never-written page fault. This patch is
for avoiding this.
Changelog:
- fixed to check pte_none() not !pte_present().
Signed-off-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Index: linux-2.6.25/mm/memory.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.25.orig/mm/memory.c
+++ linux-2.6.25/mm/memory.c
@@ -926,15 +926,15 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
page = NULL;
pgd = pgd_offset(mm, address);
if (pgd_none(*pgd) || unlikely(pgd_bad(*pgd)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
pud = pud_offset(pgd, address);
if (pud_none(*pud) || unlikely(pud_bad(*pud)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
pmd = pmd_offset(pud, address);
if (pmd_none(*pmd) || unlikely(pmd_bad(*pmd)))
- goto no_page_table;
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
if (pmd_huge(*pmd)) {
BUG_ON(flags & FOLL_GET);
@@ -947,8 +947,10 @@ struct page *follow_page(struct vm_area_
goto out;
pte = *ptep;
- if (!pte_present(pte))
- goto unlock;
+ if (!(flags & FOLL_WRITE) && pte_none(pte)) {
+ pte_unmap_unlock(ptep, ptl);
+ goto null_or_zeropage;
+ }
if ((flags & FOLL_WRITE) && !pte_write(pte))
goto unlock;
page = vm_normal_page(vma, address, pte);
@@ -968,7 +970,7 @@ unlock:
out:
return page;
-no_page_table:
+null_or_zeropage:
/*
* When core dumping an enormous anonymous area that nobody
* has touched so far, we don't want to allocate page tables.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists