linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc0

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200805010239.48789.lenb@kernel.org>
Date:	Thu, 1 May 2008 02:39:47 -0400
From:	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PATCH] ACPI patches for 2.6.26-rc0

On Wednesday 30 April 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Len Brown wrote:
> > 
> > please pull from: 
> > 
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-acpi-2.6.git release
> 
> Ok, this clashed in some nasty ways in drivers/acpi/video.c due to the 
> non-racy /proc file creation changes that came through Andrew. I fixed up 
> the result, and it *looks* sane (and compiles), but I didn't actually test 
> it, and I don't know the code well. Can you double-check.

Thanks for merging video.c
When I did my builds, andrew had not yet scribbled on video.c.
I usually do a "last minute" pull to make sure you are not faced
with any merges, but this time when I did I got some version of your
tree that wouldn't build so I figured it was still moving and didn't
bother merging with it.

Anyway, I looked over this file and the things I looked for seemed okay,
but to be sure I'll repeat your merge tomorrow and see if I come
up with the same thing.

> There were some (smaller) rejects in drivers/misc/intel_menlow.c due to 
> two different versions of the same patch from Julia Lawall (again, the 
> other came through Andrew), and I picked the one from Andrew because it 
> had the later date. But again, you should double-check.

You picked the right one.
Indeed, it looks like the other files touched in Julia's earlier
patch (9030062f3d61f87c1e787b3aa134fa3a8e4b2d25)
don't handle the failure case quite right --
Rui and I will follow-up.

thanks,
-Len

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/