linux-kernel - Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <48196C58.4030004@aknet.ru>
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2008 11:08:08 +0400
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru>
To:	Michael Opdenacker <michael-lists@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	Linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Vojtech Pavlik <vojtech@...e.cz>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [patch] pcspkr: fix dependancies

Guys, there really needs to be a
few more replies to make a decision.

So far only Dmitry have clearly stated
his opinion regarding both patches.
And that opinion was: no need for the
new config option, just get the 2.6.25
patch reverted.
Dmitry, after reading the older Michael's
thread, would you perhaps reconsider?

Sam and Michael said that just revering
may not be a good idea, but have not
commented on the patch that adds a new
option under "if EMBEDDED".

That puts me in a position where both
patches are effectively blocked, and
in a mean time snd-pcsp remains broken.

Guys, please, give your ACK or NACK on
the two posted patches! :)
Namely:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/105
http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/4/26/283
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/