[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209636359.25560.512.camel@pmac.infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 11:05:59 +0100
From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@...il.com>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Tim Bird <tim.bird@...sony.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 11:55 +0200, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> It's great that more attention is being paid to the use of Linux in
> embedded systems. And the MAINTAINERS file is probably the right file
> to add the above information. But I'm afraid that the way the above
> information is formatted will cause confusion. As an example, recently
> there was a driver added to the Linux kernel for the PCF8575 chip.
> This is an I2C chip that is only used in embedded systems. Regarding
> driver review, should any such drivers be sent to the I2C mailing
> list, the embedded mailing list or both ? The MAINTAINERS file should
> be clear on this.
The I²C list would be the best place to send such a patch. You could
also copy it to the linux-embedded list if it's likely to be of interest
to a reasonable proportion of "embedded" developers, but that wouldn't
be the primary route into Linus' tree for most things.
I can't really see any way to make that clear in the MAINTAINERS file
that wouldn't be clumsy and just as confusing -- I think it'll work out
just fine by itself. Do you have a concrete proposal?
--
dwmw2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists