[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080501102431.GC20317@shadowen.org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 11:24:31 +0100
From: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
To: Nishanth Aravamudan <nacc@...ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: false negative in checpatch for asm/ vs. linux/
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 09:49:18AM -0700, Nishanth Aravamudan wrote:
> Hi Andy,
>
> I think the following:
>
> #warn if <asm/foo.h> is #included and <linux/foo.h> is available (uses RAW line)
> if ($tree && $rawline =~ m{^.\#\s*include\s*\<asm\/(.*)\.h\>}) {
> my $checkfile = "$root/include/linux/$1.h";
> if (-f $checkfile && $1 ne 'irq') {
> WARN("Use #include <linux/$1.h> instead of <asm/$1.h>\n" .
> $herecurr);
> }
> }
>
> in checkpatch.pl can lead to false positives for asm/ includes from within
> linux/ files? e.g., I have a patch which moves the asm/hugetlb.h #include up to
> the top of include/linux/hugetlb.h, but I get:
>
> [09:46:27]nacc@...anoid:~/linux/views/linux-2.6-work$ git show HEAD | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl -
> WARNING: Use #include <linux/hugetlb.h> instead of <asm/hugetlb.h>
> #17: FILE: include/linux/hugetlb.h:8:
> +#include <asm/hugetlb.h>
Yes, clearly stupid and trivial to detect. Will be sorted in the 0.19.
Thanks for the report.
-apw
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists