linux-kernel - Re: RFC: starting a kernel-testers group for newbies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 01 May 2008 13:42:44 +0100
From:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
To:	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: starting a kernel-testers group for newbies

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 07:15 -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> Maybe that's a "boggle" for you; but for me that's symptomatic of
> where we are today: We don't make (effective) prioritization
> decisions. Such decisions are hard, because it effectively means
> telling people "I'm sorry but your bug is not yet important". 

It's not that clear-cut, either. Something which manifests itself as a
build failure or an immediate test failure on m68k alone, might actually
turn out to cause subtle data corruption on other platforms.

You can't always know that it isn't important, just because it only
shows up in some esoteric circumstances. You only really know how
important it was _after_ you've fixed it.

That obviously doesn't help us to prioritise.

-- 
dwmw2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/