lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2008 13:51:16 +0100
From:	David Greaves <david@...eaves.com>
To:	alex14641@...oo.com
CC:	linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Sharing disks amoung multiple software RAIDs

Alex Davis wrote:
> Is this a bad thing? I'm guessing that it is, but I want independent
> confirmation before I spoke to someone I know who's doing this.
> 
> Thanks
Depends what you're trying to do.

It has the potential to increase i/o contention so it's not going to be a
performance win. Many systems really don't need to worry about performance. But
if you have 2x250 Gb drives and 1x500 Gb drive then your data is at less risk if
you partition the 500Gb into 2x250Gb and then mirror each partition with a full
250Gb disk. That would be a perfectly rational setup in many instances.

Equally, md has a mechanism to share hot spares amongst multiple RAIDs - but I
doubt that's what you meant.

David


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ