[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080501144500.GE28005@nibiru.local>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 16:45:01 +0200
From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@...ux.de>
To: linux kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] OMFS filesystem version 3
* Szabolcs Szakacsits <szaka@...s-3g.org> wrote:
Hi folks,
<big_snip />
I've just fought through this thread, maybe missed some points,
and I'll try no to repeat to repeat arguments already said, but:
IMHO, many of the filesystems should belong to userland,
(especially those I'd call "exotic"). Maybe some decision points:
* high complexity (-> not easy to debug)
* not required for booting
* not yet matured (within kernel)
* not performance critical
* requires much userland assistance
* not used permanently (just from time to time)
* not actually an IPC mechanism
My first candidate would be coda:
It never worked well for me, even often have to reload the
kernel driver. As most of the logic already *is* in userland,
there wouldn't be a performance tradeoff when doing the kernel
interface entirely via FUSE or even let venus just be an 9P server.
cu
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt == metux IT service - http://www.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please visit the OpenSource QM Taskforce:
http://wiki.metux.de/public/OpenSource_QM_Taskforce
Patches / Fixes for a lot dozens of packages in dozens of versions:
http://patches.metux.de/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists