[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080501122136.bc2215c9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 12:21:36 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
Cc: ezk@...sunysb.edu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
hch@...radead.org, mhalcrow@...ibm.com, hugh@...itas.com
Subject: Re: [2.6.26 PATCH, RESEND]: fs_stack/eCryptfs: fsstack_copy_*
updates
On Thu, 1 May 2008 13:18:09 -0400
Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu> wrote:
> In message <20080430101704.9cbd6384.akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Andrew Morton writes:
> [...[
> > Can we avoid having to think?
> >
> > void fsstack_copy_inode_size(struct inode *dst, const struct inode *src)
> > {
> > blkcnt_t i_blocks;
> > loff_t i_size;
> >
> > i_size = i_size_read(src);
> > spin_lock_32bit(&src->i_lock);
> > i_blocks = src->i_blocks;
> > spin_unlock_32bit(&src->i_lock);
> >
> > i_size_write(dst, i_size);
> > spin_lock_32bit(&dst->i_lock)
> > dst->i_blocks = i_blocks;
> > spin_unlock_32bit(&dst->i_lock)
> > }
>
> I can't find spin_[um]lock_32bit anywhere (checkd latest mmotm and linus's
> tree). I therefore assume this was just your way of saying I should:
>
> #if BITS_PER_LONG == 32
> spin_unlock(&dst->i_lock);
> #endif
Nope, it was my way of suggesting that you implement it ;)
include/linux/spinlock.h would be a good place.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists