[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804301821380.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, rjw@...k.pl,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
jirislaby@...il.com
Subject: Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
On Thu, 1 May 2008, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> One big problem I see is Linus wanting to merge all drivers regardless
> of the quality.
That's not what I said.
What I said was that I think we get *better* quality by merging early.
In other words, you're turning the whole argument on its head, and
incorrectly so.
I claim that you are the one that is arguing for *worse* quality, by
arguing for a process that is KNOWN to tend to generate bad code
(out-of-tree drivers) as opposed to one that tends to fix things over time
(and note the "tends" in both cases - there are counter-examples, but
the trend is so clear that anybody who disputes it would seem to be either
blind or lying).
So here's my challenge: give me *one* reason to believe that quality
improves more out-of-tree than it does in-tree, and then you'll have a
point. But you'd better be able to explain the ton of historical data we
have that proves otherwise.
Until you do that, your blathering is just that - total blathering. The
process I advocate is the one that has historical data on its side. Yours
is just a failed theory.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists