[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1209677160.12461.267.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 14:26:00 -0700
From: Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lucho@...kov.net, ericvh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix flags length in net 9p
On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 14:19 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 1 May 2008 17:08:05 -0400 (EDT)
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > Some files in the net/9p directory uses "int" for flags. This can
> > cause hard to find bugs on some architectures. This patch converts the
> > flags to use "long" instead.
>
> gargh.
>
> > This bug was discovered by doing an allyesconfig make on the -rt kernel
> > where checks are done to ensure all flags are of size sizeof(long).
>
> I was about to suggest that we do something like that...
>
> I wonder how messy it is. I long ago lost the ability to follow the
> convolutions in include/linux/spinlock*.h :( gotta patch?
The check that's in -rt for this uses BUILD_BUG_ON(), and it's extremely
cryptic when there is a failure .. Most people will be baffled why the
build stopped. If a check went into mainline it should at least give you
some sort of idea what's happening ..
Daniel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists