[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <86802c440805011431i88dec8aiadcb143b5f7648b@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2008 14:31:16 -0700
From: "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@...il.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: "Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Gabriel C" <nix.or.die@...glemail.com>,
"Mika Fischer" <mika.fischer@...pnet.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: mtrr cleanup for converting continuous to discrete - auto detect v2
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 2:26 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> Yinghai Lu wrote:
>
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Yes, 16 GB systems are already mainstream; 32 GB is common, so I don't
> see
> > > any reason to stop at 2 GB. Instead, it should loop up to the physical
> > > address size.
> > >
> >
> > but our objective is that has 0xd0000000-0xe0000000 (WC) not to be
> > overlapping with other MTRR entries (UC)..
> >
> >
>
> So, pray tell, how comes this algorithm can come up with a non-solution to
> the problem presented to it?
>
> Overall, I'm feeling there is something really completely wrong if this
> needs manual tunables of any sort.
the problem is BIOS set MTRR like BIG WB - SOME SAMLL UC to spare mtrr regs.
but later X server driver want to set some range to WC. that already
is fallen in UC...
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists