linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix flags length in net 9p

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209679278.12461.268.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Date:	Thu, 01 May 2008 15:01:18 -0700
From:	Daniel Walker <dwalker@...sta.com>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, lucho@...kov.net, ericvh@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix flags length in net 9p


On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 00:41 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> > The check that's in -rt for this uses BUILD_BUG_ON(), and it's extremely
> > cryptic when there is a failure .. Most people will be baffled why the
> > build stopped. If a check went into mainline it should at least give you
> > some sort of idea what's happening ..
> 
> A cryptic compile error is _much_ better than a hard to find runtime 
> error.

I think we ultimately want something informative if it's possible.
That's what I want.

Daniel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/