linux-kernel - Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ed10ee420804301856u3ec1c5e6p453e929b899e926c@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 30 Apr 2008 18:56:05 -0700
From:	"SL Baur" <steve@...acs.org>
To:	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc:	12o3l@...cali.nl, greg@...ah.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: patch usb-mos7840-test-and-propagate-set_uart_reg-return-value.patch added to gregkh-2.6 tree

On 4/29/08, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 12:33:39AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>  > On 4/28/08, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
>  > > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:31:07PM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
>  >
>  > > Does that mean that the original patch is invalid?  Or just that your
>  > >  question was never answered?
>  >
>  > I think there are more of the same issues that the patch
>  > addressed in the same file and the patcher never responded
>  > back about that.
>
>
> But again, is the current patch somehow not valid?

No, it's fine.

-sb
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/