[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804302016390.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 20:19:16 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
jeff@...zik.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] net: fix returning void-valued expression
warnings
On Wed, 30 Apr 2008, Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
> Well, in an X86_32 allyesconfig, this only trips 32 times...so it's not
> exactly common. I agree that there is nothing _wrong_ with this, I'll
> just add Linus and see if we can just call it codingstyle ;)
I actually had a patch to sparse to _not_ complain about it, because I
think it's one of the sane C++ extensions. I must have lost the patch and
not sent it upstream.
So in general, I don't mind the "return void_function()" in a void
function, I think it makes sense from a type standpoint, and sometimes
results in cleaner code. That said, I'm also not sure it's worth breaking
the C standard over, so I don't really mind it being fixed in the kernel
either (but would certainly also not complain if sparse were to be changed
to not complain)
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists