| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 14:39:13 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, davem@...emloft.net Subject: Re: Who reverted 2.6.25 - stats Jan Engelhardt wrote: > One thing I noticed is that reverts are not always marked with the word > "revert" in the summary line even though it normally would be, IMO the summary line of a fix should tell what is being fixed. The changelog can then go on to explain how the fix works. For example, by reverting all or parts of a previous commit. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= ---=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists