linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 May 2008 22:50:44 +1000
From:	Keith Owens <kaos@....com.au>
To:	paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
cc:	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, jeremy@...p.org, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/10] Add generic helpers for arch IPI function calls 

"Paul E. McKenney" (on Fri, 2 May 2008 05:29:55 -0700) wrote:
>OK -- for some reason, I was thinking that it was illegal to
>invoke smp_call_function() with irqs disabled...
>
>Ah, I see it -- smp_call_function_mask() says:
>
> * You must not call this function with disabled interrupts or from a
> * hardware interrupt handler or from a bottom half handler.
>
>So we have no problem with smp_call_function, then.
>
>OK, so smp_call_function() -can- be invoked with irqs disabled?
>Hmmm...  I will give this some thought.

Doing any smp_call_function with interrupts disabled is a potential
deadlock.  See http://lkml.org/lkml/2004/5/2/116.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/