[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.1.10.0805021627460.6463@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:31:23 +0200 (CEST)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
To: jeffschroeder@...puter.org
cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
John Johansen <jjohansen@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released
On Friday 2008-05-02 16:15, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
>
>Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor
>exists in Ubuntu 8.04.
>Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test
>succeeds? Does this work in SUSE?
>
>http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_test_for_btrfs.patch
Woah, you rely on autoconf.h. Uh no thanks, let the build system handle it.
# -*- Makefile -*-
btrfs-objs := ...
obj-m += btrfs.o and-so-on.o
ifneq (${CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR},)
EXTRA_CFLAGS += -DI_HAZ_AN_APPARMOR
endif
all:
${MAKE} -C ${kdir} M=$PWD all;
Best of all, you can override that from the command line too...
make CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR=y
(and if you don't, it takes its value from the appropriate .config,
all without you having to care about autoconf.h)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists