linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 May 2008 18:00:43 +0300
From:	"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To:	"Andi Kleen" <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	"Tim Bird" <tim.bird@...sony.com>, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	"Paul Gortmaker" <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	linux-embedded@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"Eduard-Gabriel Munteanu" <eduard.munteanu@...ux360.ro>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Embedded Maintainer(s), linux-embedded@...r list

Hi Andi,

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 1:41 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > To a large extent, I agree. I certainly don't want to focus solely on
> > code size; there's a lot more to embedded Linux than that. But it _is_
>
>  Not only code size, far more important is dynamic memory consumption.
>  [admittedly we right now lack a good instrumentation framework for this]

There's a Google Summer of Code project going on now to implement such
instrumentation:

http://code.google.com/soc/2008/linux/appinfo.html?csaid=E749E676AD70FBB0

So any suggestions/input on this is obviously welcome.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/