| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <s5habj8odtq.wl%tiwai@suse.de> Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 18:44:49 +0200 From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> To: Stas Sergeev <stsp@...et.ru> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.25-mm1 (snd-pcsp doesn't like DEBUG_PAGEALLOC) t Fri, 25 Apr 2008 18:51:04 +0200, I wrote: > > At Fri, 25 Apr 2008 20:45:51 +0400, > Stas Sergeev wrote: > > > > > But anyway, as mentioned in my previous post, snd-pcsp wouldn't be > > > enabled on most of distros' kernels because it cannot be built > > > together with input-pcspkr driver, unfortunately... > > Yes, making them to play well together is > > something to think about too. But I don't > > see how it can affect the distributors. > > If the distro doesn't have the sound enabled, > > then it won't enable snd-pcsp no matter > > what. If it does have the sound enabled, > > then why would it ever want to use pcspkr > > instead of snd-pcsp? > > The sound subsystem is enabled (loaded) only when necessary. > As long as there are many systems without the sound subsystem > (i.e. servers), snd-pcsp wouldn't be built (thus not provided even as > a module) for their kernels because it prevents input-pcspkr. ... and I completely missed the viewpoint of device allocation. Yeah, that'll be a bit hackish. Takashi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists