[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481B79EF.3090200@austin.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 15:30:39 -0500
From: Joel Schopp <jschopp@...tin.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Anton Blanchard <anton@....ibm.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: questions on calc_delta_mine() in sched.c
>> if (unlikely(!lw->inv_weight))
>> lw->inv_weight = (WMULT_CONST-lw->weight/2) / (lw->weight+1);
>>
>>
>> Q1) This code is hit often in scenarios I run, is this really unlikely for
>> others?
>
> I think it became a lot more likely recently, perhaps removing that
> unlikely is not such a bad idea.
Especially if you remove the divide in the other locations, then this might
even be likely.
>
>> Q2) The rest of the code in sched.c seems to make inv_weight ==
>> WMULT_CONST/weight and I was wondering if you could explain why this
>> instance is different.
>
> because the rest of the code is wrong, there are only 2 other sites, and
> I have a patch that removes those div64_64() with =0;
>
> The idea is to use rounding division: (x + y/2) / y
> but we can't because 'x' is touching the limits of our modulo space,
> hence we do: (x - y/2) / y
> which comes in 1 short, that fixup has been lost along the way.
Ah, that makes more sense, and the fact that it is broken explains why I
couldn't figure it out.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists