[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200805021658.01459.chris.mason@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:58:00 -0400
From: Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>
To: Tim Gardner <timg@....com>
Cc: jeffschroeder@...puter.org, Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
John Johansen <jjohansen@...e.de>
Subject: Re: Btrfs v0.14 Released
On Friday 02 May 2008, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Chris Mason wrote:
> > On Friday 02 May 2008, Jeff Schroeder wrote:
> >
> > [ Btrfs oops with apparmor patched in ]
> >
> >> Make is not my forte, but here is a working test to see if apparmor
> >> exists in Ubuntu 8.04.
> >> Maybe have make apply a patch to the btrfs source if this test
> >> succeeds? Does this work in SUSE?
> >>
> >> http://www.digitalprognosis.com/opensource/patches/btrfs/lame_apparmor_t
> >>est _for_btrfs.patch
> >
> > Thanks, but this uses CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR which isn't enough to tell
> > if the kernel has the patch. Lets go back to Jeff's suse patch:
> >
I ended up using the CONFIG_SECURITY_APPARMOR test because the other test
suggested here sounded like something that might eventually not be very
ubuntu specific (instead of the nice a plain CONFIG_SUSE_KERNEL).
Thanks to everyone for the hints, if someone could please test:
http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Hot_Fixes
I'd be grateful.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists