lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 02 May 2008 15:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	Eric.Moore@....com
Cc:	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: HELP: Is writeq an atomic operation??

From: "Moore, Eric" <Eric.Moore@....com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 16:19:49 -0600

> Is a 64bit write to MMIO registers an atomic operation when using the
> writeq API?  

The answer to this question this is platform dependent.

On most 64-bit platforms, it is.  On some 32-bit ones, it is not.

This is not a SCSI layer question, so belongs minimally on
linux-kernel which I've CC:'d.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ