lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 17:17:27 -0600 From: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Extend list debugging to cover hlists On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 04:14:03PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > linux-next is a better tree against which to prepare 2.6.x+1 patches. Is there a reason to wait for 2.6.x+1? People are having problems today with corrupt hlists. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists