[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080502.165455.24687234.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 02 May 2008 16:54:55 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: xiyou.wangcong@...il.com
Cc: herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...l.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch] (revised) net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c: replace timer with
delayed_work
From: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 13:35:55 +0800 (CST)
>
> As suggested by Herbert Xu, using workqueue is better than timer
> for net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c, so replace them with delayed_work.
> And due to this change, we have to disable BH when trying to
> lock.
>
> Note that, this patch is not fully tested, so should be
> in -mm first.
>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <wangcong@...ux.org>
Please let me know when these two patches have gotten some
good testing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists