| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 03:19:00 +0200 From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, sfrench@...ibm.com, swhiteho@...hat.com, jeff@...zik.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org, drzeus-list@...eus.cx, jack@....cz, cbou@...l.ru, jens.axboe@...cle.com, ericvh@...il.com, wim@...ana.be, chris@...kel.net, nico@....org, penberg@...helsinki.fi, clameter@....com, ezk@...sunysb.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: git trees which are not yet in linux-next Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 2 May 2008 15:12:06 -0700 > Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > >> The first >> problem is working out "how the heck did that patch get into linux-next"? >> That would be much easier if the signoff trail was complete for git-based >> patches, but it often is not. > > doh. I'm pulling linux-next's constituent trees independently, so if I > spot a turd in linux-next I can just grep the various git trees to find out > where it came from. > > It seems wrong though... What about the committer info? Well, I suppose a nobody@...alhost slips in, but more often I expect it to be something more telling than that. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=-= ---== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists