[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.1.10.0805031039430.5994@woody.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2008 10:51:47 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Austin Clements <amdragon+kernelbugzilla@....edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, john stultz <johnstul@...ibm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] posix timers: sigqueue_free: don't free sigqueue if
it is queued
On Sat, 3 May 2008, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> Note: I am not sure we shouldn't do the opposite, free sigqueue + cancel the
> pending signal, but this needs some ugly changes. Perhaps we should reconsider
> this change later. See also http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10460
You know what, I think there might be an even simple solution.
How about just setting a bit saying it is canceled - and nothing more.
Then, the dequeue logic can be just taught to ignore those things.
Doesn't that sound like the simple way to cancel signals? Make
collect_signal() just do a "return 0" if the signal has been flushed..
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists