[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080502193128.5e1de100.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 19:31:28 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joern@...ybastard.org,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix checkstack.pl arch detection
On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:20:48 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2008 00:37:03 +0200
> > J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:20:53 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> uname -m was leaving a newline in $arch, and not passing the tests.
> >>>
> >>> Also, printing the unknown arch on failure is probably helpful.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> >> Reviewed-By: Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>
> >>
> >
> > please cc apw on checkpatch changes.
> >
> > This patch needs some help to merge against the forthcoming
> > checkpatch-0.19. I sent your patches apw-wards.
> >
>
> Um, checkpatch or checkstack? :)
>
bah.
hm, I wonder why one of them got a reject. `patch -l' was needed. Mailer
munchies, perhaps?
Please check that what I applied is still correct.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists