linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fix checkstack.pl arch detection

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 2 May 2008 19:31:28 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
Cc:	Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joern@...ybastard.org,
	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix checkstack.pl arch detection

On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:20:48 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote:

> Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 May 2008 00:37:03 +0200
> > J__rn Engel <joern@...fs.org> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Fri, 2 May 2008 12:20:53 -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >>> uname -m was leaving a newline in $arch, and not passing the tests.
> >>>
> >>> Also, printing the unknown arch on failure is probably helpful.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
> >> Reviewed-By: Joern Engel <joern@...fs.org>
> >>
> > 
> > please cc apw on checkpatch changes.
> > 
> > This patch needs some help to merge against the forthcoming
> > checkpatch-0.19.  I sent your patches apw-wards.
> > 
> 
> Um, checkpatch or checkstack? :)
> 

bah.

hm, I wonder why one of them got a reject.  `patch -l' was needed.  Mailer
munchies, perhaps?

Please check that what I applied is still correct.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/