| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20080502195118.39a3fc99.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 19:51:18 -0700 From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> Cc: Jörn Engel <joern@...fs.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joern@...ybastard.org, Andy Whitcroft <apw@...dowen.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix checkstack.pl arch detection On Fri, 02 May 2008 21:40:23 -0500 Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com> wrote: > Andrew Morton wrote: > > >>> please cc apw on checkpatch changes. > >>> > >>> This patch needs some help to merge against the forthcoming > >>> checkpatch-0.19. I sent your patches apw-wards. > >>> > >> Um, checkpatch or checkstack? :) > >> > > > > bah. > > > > hm, I wonder why one of them got a reject. `patch -l' was needed. Mailer > > munchies, perhaps? > > > > Please check that what I applied is still correct. > > They look fine... sorry, didn't generate against -mm but didn't expect > differences. I'll update an -mm tree and give it a functional check too... > There are no changes since 2.6.25. "find dynamic stack allocations in checkstack.pl" just doesn't apply. Hunk 1 assumes that "fix checkstack.pl arch detection" is present, but when "fix checkstack.pl arch detection" is applied, hunks 1 and 2 don't apply. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists