[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m37ieb84ve.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 23:17:09 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> writes:
> I'm not even sure the semantics of "select follows dependencies"
> would actually be better than what we have today.
I think it would. But how would that actually work? By displaying all
relevant dependency chains and asking the user to select one?
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists