[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080503.160408.238581868.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sat, 03 May 2008 16:04:08 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: mingo@...e.hu
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, efault@....de,
elendil@...net.nl, parag.warudkar@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, guichaz@...oo.fr, andi@...stfloor.org
Subject: Re: 'global' rq->clock
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 00:38:44 +0200
> the same bug existed on x86 too: that too does a few IPIs without
> irq_enter/irq_exit. We now removed the softlockup dependency so it
> should not be required to do an irq_enter()/exit anymore - unless the
> code that the IPI uses accesses jiffies. (but that would be unusual)
That move doesn't solve the problem, I'm strongly certain
arch's still need to add the irq_{enter,exit}().
I'll revert the irq_{enter,exit}() changes on one of my
sparc64 boxes to validate this later today.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists