[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3r6cj5584.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 01:37:47 +0200
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Ingo, no more kconfig patches
Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> writes:
> FB_SGIVW requires X86_VISWS and it's selected automatically.
>
> (which is not good if you want a kernel that runs on a PC)
Not sure what do you mean, it currently seem to "depend" on X86_VISWS:
config FB_SGIVW
tristate "SGI Visual Workstation framebuffer support"
depends on FB && X86_VISWS
select FB_CFB_FILLRECT
select FB_CFB_COPYAREA
select FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT
> Why do we have to bother users with the MII option at all?
>
> "E1000E=m and TULIP=m but MII=y" works, but it doesn't really make
> sense.
(Obviously it assumes both TULIP and E1000E required MII which is not
exactly the case)
But it makes a perfect sense, I can have modular drivers for (few)
hardware devices (just in case I want to rmmod etc) but most of the
kernel may be not modular. It would be nice if the Kconfig ask me if
I want to "select" the dependency Y or M, even if there is only one
way to make "select" dependencies happy (not counting "Y vs "M").
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists