lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 3 May 2008 10:13:32 +0300
From:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Hiroshi Shimamoto <h-shimamoto@...jp.nec.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: x86 git acpi issue?

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 05:08:12PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Hiroshi Shimamoto wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> commit: afcab879e4044f952b7a031d5fd504e0feb7df41
>> visws: build fix
>>
>> breaks something around acpi on 32bit.
>> In my test box scsi driver complains and the kernel doesn't boot.
>>
>> I'm not sure, but when moving the acpi.o before legacy.o, it works.
>> --- a/arch/x86/pci/Makefile_32
>> +++ b/arch/x86/pci/Makefile_32
>> @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_DIRECT)	+= direct.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCI_OLPC)		+= olpc.o
>>   pci-y				:= fixup.o
>> +pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
>>  pci-y				+= legacy.o irq.o
>>   pci-$(CONFIG_X86_VISWS)		:= visws.o fixup.o
>>  pci-$(CONFIG_X86_NUMAQ)		:= numa.o irq.o
>> -pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI)		+= acpi.o
>>  pci-$(CONFIG_NUMA)		+= mp_bus_to_node.o
>>   obj-y				+= $(pci-y) common.o early.o
>>
>> of cause this isn't correct patch, it's just a workaround for me.
>>
>
> The problem is that := should be += for the VISWS and NUMAQ lines. There 
> is already a patch queued up to fix that.

Commit afcab879e4044f952b7a031d5fd504e0feb7df41 is the commit where Ingo 
both _reverts_ his patch you describe in the x86 tree and additionally 
moves pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI) in exactly the way that causes this breakage.

In the 4 hours between Ingo doing the += change and Ingo reverting his 
own patch in the x86 tree it was in a pull request to Linus, so the
"queued up" patch is in Linus' tree but reverted in the x86 tree.

I saw neither the patch changing the :='s to += on linux-kernel nor does 
"do not override the existing pci-y rule when adding visws or numaq 
rules." in the commit description give any indication what the actual 
problem was.

It's also not obvious why the revert with the subject "visws: build fix" 
also moved the pci-$(CONFIG_ACPI) causing this bug here.

> 	-hpa

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ