[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20080502173030.33c40213.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 17:30:30 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/12] net: use the common ascii hex helpers
On Fri, 02 May 2008 17:15:55 -0700
Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@...il.com> wrote:
> int hex_char_to_int(char ch)
> {
> return -1 if not [a-fA-F0-9]
> }
>
> int hex_to_u8(const char *buf, u8 *val)
> int hex_to_u16(const char *buf, u16 *val)
> int hex_to_u32(const char *buf, u32 *val)
> int hex_to_u64(const char *buf, u64 *val)
>
> Which return the number of chars read and reads up to a maximum of
> 2,4,8,16 chars respectively and returns early if a non-hex char
> is encountered.
>
> Thoughts?
I dunno. Return-by-reference is a bit nasty and forces the compiler to
generate extra code to put local storage into a stack slot rather than
keeping it in a register.
Does anyone actually test whether hex_to_foo returns -1? Probably not
many.
In which case it might be better to do
u64 hex_to_u64(const char *buf);
and, if we encounter a non-hex char, do a WARN_ON(1).
One could legitimately do
int c = hex_to_int(some_user_input);
if (c < 0) {
printk("user: you're an idiot\n");
}
to perform validation and conversion in a single operation but I expect
that such code is in the minority, and could be covered by running a separate
bool is_hex_string(const char *bug, size_t nchars);
beforehand?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists