linux-kernel - Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20080504123008.GE19717@sgi.com>
Date:	Sun, 4 May 2008 07:30:08 -0500
From:	Robin Holt <holt@....com>
To:	Alistair John Strachan <alistair@...zero.co.uk>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.26-rc1

On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 10:53:22PM +0100, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> On Saturday 03 May 2008 22:47:38 Alistair John Strachan wrote:
> > On Saturday 03 May 2008 20:38:20 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > So go out and test it.
> [snip]
> > Why is this option acting like CONFIG_EMBEDDED and not like basically every
> > other subsystem where I can turn ON support for hardware, but by default
> > it's OFF? (Obviously in my hasty oldconfig run I just went with the
> > default.)
> 
> Amazingly, even if I say Y to this option and disable all tuners, it still 
> tries (and fails) to compile this file. What is pulling in this tuner-core 
> dependency?

What if you change CONFIG_MEDIA_TUNER to a 'n'

Robin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/