linux-kernel - Re: i387/FPU init issues...

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1209913612.6972.89.camel@localhost>
Date:	Sun, 04 May 2008 11:06:52 -0400
From:	jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>
To:	Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Cc:	"Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@...ux-mips.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jbeulich@...ell.com
Subject: Re: i387/FPU init issues...

On Sun, 2008-04-05 at 15:08 +0200, Sebastian Herbszt wrote:

> this is the same result i get with qemu 0.8.2. 

Thanks for validating. 
I am embarassed to say I am still running version 0.7.0 - problem is i
have patched it semi-substantially to add features which i didnt get
much luck in pushing in; so i cant upgrade overnight.

> With version 0.9.0 and
> later it is:

Ok, maybe it is time to invest time to forward port my patches. I dont
see anything in the release notes between 0.8.2 and 0.9.0 which says
this problem was known and fixed in some specific version. Any pointers?

Thanks again - you saved me a lot of time.

cheers,
jamal

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/