[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080504153056.GJ5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 16:30:56 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Bryan Wu <cooloney@...nel.org>
Cc: torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] [vfs/proc] task_nommu: fix compile failing bug
because of spilt file.h
On Sun, May 04, 2008 at 11:12:55PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> index 6cba820..987bc69 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_nommu.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/file.h>
> +#include <linux/fdtable.h>
> #include <linux/mount.h>
> #include <linux/ptrace.h>
> #include <linux/seq_file.h>
Well... I see what it's trying to do, but it's a bullshit. Look: it's from
if (current->files && atomic_read(¤t->files->count) > 1)
sbytes += kobjsize(current->files);
else
bytes += kobjsize(current->files);
Now, what we really have is size of current->files (fixed and not too large)
+ if descriptor table is too large to be embedded,
size of current->files->fdt
size of current->files->fdt->fd
size of current->files->fdt->open_fds/->close_on_exec
And the second term there can be *large*, so if we are really serious about
taking descriptor table footprint into account, we'd better take care of
that too. I'm not sure that we want to, though - note that we do that only
on nommu targets...
So what's that code really trying to achieve?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists