[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20080504222246.50dc6f5b@highlander.home.lan>
Date: Sun, 4 May 2008 22:22:46 +0200
From: Malte Schröder <maltesch@....de>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Hard lockup with kernel 2.6.25 and 2.6.25.1
On Sun, 4 May 2008 21:56:26 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de> wrote:
>
> On Sunday 2008-05-04 11:51, Malte Schröder wrote:
> >>
> >> If it's repeatable, it would be interesting if you are able to do a
> >> git-bisect to try to narrow the issue down...
> >
> >Hmm, that's about the only box of mine where bisecting a kernel really
> >hurts. It's my central VoIP, internet, mail and other stuff gateway and
> >it takes ages to boot (it's the box where my old hardware ends up).
>
> You can compile the tree elsewhere (without nfs) and then run the
> appropriate install mechanisms with an NFS mount.
>
Oh, that's not the problem, I use the debian's kernel-package
build-system
. The problem is that the affected box is about the only box
where I really don't like downtime because it handles my
internet connection, email and telephony.
Besides from that I am currently trying to find the last working
kernel-version, since 2.6.24.6 shows the same problem.
I am currently running 2.6.24.5 again. Let's see if that runs stable.
When I have found a stable kernel I think I will bisect it, but I am
quite busy currently so it could take a while. Who knows, maybe it's
not the kernel's fault at all but some strange kind of hardware failure.
Regards
--
---------------------------------------
Malte Schröder
MalteSch@....de
ICQ# 68121508
---------------------------------------
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists