[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <481E2C88.2010702@zytor.com>
Date: Sun, 04 May 2008 14:37:12 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...ozas.de>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
jamal <hadi@...erus.ca>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: i387/FPU init issues...
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Saturday 2008-05-03 19:39, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> great. So this NOP is indeed not generally known to all "P6 and later"
>>> CPUs. (the PII)
>> Looks like. My analysis was wrong, as I got the P6 vs. PII/PIII
>> confused :) Damn unintutive numbering, I thought ARM is worse but I'm
>> not so sure anymore.
>
> Guess that Intel named it Pentium II either because Hexium
> ("5"86:Pentium, "6"86:Hexium) would have been a strange name, or the
> successor to the Pentium/586 was not that great an improvement.
> Or something else? Always kept me wondering.
Yeah, "Hexium" didn't quite work, and they thought they'd already gotten
a working brand with "Pentium". That it clashed with their previous
public prerelease naming scheme of P+number ("P", I believe, for
"project" or "processor") didn't matter.
The Pentium 4 is properly called the P7, but almost noone calls it that.
"Pentium" is also a highly unstable isotope of hydrogen (Hydrogen-5),
with a half-life under a zeptosecond.
-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists